Feynman Diagrams
https://researchmatters.in/
enBridged: Gaps between mathematical methods of understanding nature
https://researchmatters.in/news/bridged-gaps-between-mathematical-methods-understanding-nature
<span class="a2a_kit a2a_kit_size_32 addtoany_list" data-a2a-url="https://researchmatters.in/news/bridged-gaps-between-mathematical-methods-understanding-nature" data-a2a-title="Bridged: Gaps between mathematical methods of understanding nature"><a class="a2a_button_facebook"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter"></a><a class="a2a_button_email"></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Fresearchmatters.in%2Fnews%2Fbridged-gaps-between-mathematical-methods-understanding-nature&title=Bridged%3A%20Gaps%20between%20mathematical%20methods%20of%20understanding%20nature"></a></span>
<div class="field field--name-field-op-author field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden field__items">
<div class="field__item"><a href="https://researchmatters.in/people/daebadatata-paala-debdutta-paul" hreflang="en">দেবদত্ত পাল। Debdutta Paul</a></div>
</div>
Read time: 8 mins
<div class="field field--name-field-place field--type-string field--label-hidden field__item">Bengaluru</div>
<span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden">28 May 2021</span>
<div class="field field--name-field-graphic field--type-image field--label-hidden field__item"> <img loading="lazy" src="https://researchmatters.in/sites/researchmatters.in/files/styles/large_800w_scale/public/feynman_diagrams-debdutta1.jpg?itok=nGdWcroC" width="800" height="450" alt="Bridged: Gaps between mathematical methods of understanding nature" title="A Feynman diagram in quantum electrodynamics, a quantum field theory. [Image Credits: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0]" typeof="foaf:Image" class="image-style-large-800w-scale" /></div>
<div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p style="text-align: center;"><sup><span style="color:#a9a9a9;">A Feynman diagram in quantum electrodynamics, a quantum field theory. [Image Credits: <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/" target="_blank">Wikimedia Commons</a> / CC BY-SA 4.0]</span></sup></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the first two decades of the twentieth century, Albert Einstein developed the special theory of relativity, which unifies the previously separate entities ‘space’ and ‘time’. Later, he developed the general theory of relativity, which provides a mathematical and conceptual framework of gravitation. In the next decade, theoretical physicists had developed a mathematical framework that describes the world of small things –– electrons, protons, atoms, molecules –– called ‘quantum mechanics’. Despite tremendous successes of special relativity and quantum mechanics in describing a plethora of natural phenomena, they remained incompatible in mathematical terms. In the next few years emerged the field of ‘quantum field theory’, a general mathematical framework used to describe multiple physical theories that unify the salient features of special relativity and quantum mechanics.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Over the next few decades, theoretical physicists developed multiple quantum field theories with the help of advanced mathematics. These theories successfully plugged the mathematical loopholes in physical theories and predicted the existence of new particles in nature –– the ‘neutrons’ which along with protons make up the nuclei of atoms, ‘positrons’ or positively charged electrons, and the list continued. Meanwhile, experimental physicists were busy hunting for these particles, and surprisingly, finding them. Due to the interplay of theoretical and experimental physics, one discovery led to another, and ‘particle physics’ became the cool thing to be investigating. The ‘Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire’ (CERN), or European Council for Nuclear Research, came into existence, and so did numerous other particle physics detectors around the world. In 2012, CERN finally discovered the ‘Higgs particle’ –– the final building block of the now-famous ‘Standard Model of Particle Physics’, a model that successfully accommodates multiple quantum field theories into one mathematical framework.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Standard Model of Particle Physics comes with multiple limitations –– for example, it cannot explain the well-established experimental fact that neutrinos, a particle that travels close to the speed of light, possesses mass. Gravitation, the phenomenon that Einstein explained with his general theory of relativity, does not feature in the Standard Model either. In the last few decades, theoretical physicists have worked extensively on alternate theories of the Universe that provides a quantum field theory for gravitation, the most famous among them being ‘string theory’. In the search for such theories, one aspect got largely forgotten in the last 50 years –– that quantum field theories encounter infinities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">While trying to calculate the probabilities of events using quantum field theories, physicists encountered mathematical infinities that made no sense. After all, infinities do not correspond to anything tangible in nature. While a group of physicists concluded that quantum field theories were inadequate in describing nature, another group devised an alternative explanation. According to the second group, while some terms in the equations had positive infinities, others had negative infinities of the same magnitude. These infinities cancelled, they said –– there was no logical fallacy. The infinities arose because of the limitation of the mathematical method they used to calculate probabilities of physical events. However, they were not ready to divorce from the method. Called the ‘Feynman diagrams’, the mathematical method helped physicists picturise physical processes. An alternative mathematical method, called the ‘Bootstrap approach’, was neater. It had no pesky infinities nor cancellation of positive and negative infinities. However, the mathematical steps were complex, and physicists could not clearly understand the probabilities they calculated via physical processes. The Bootstrap approach quickly fell out of favour and was soon forgotten.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In a new <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.181601" target="_blank">study</a>, two researchers from the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru, have used the ‘Bootstrap approach’ of quantum field theories to explain ‘Feynman diagrams’. Professor Aninda Sinha and PhD scholar Ahmadullah Zahed carried out the research in the Centre for High Energy Physics of IISc. Published in the journal <em>Physical Review Letters</em>, the study was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Aninda explains why physicists did not pursue the Bootstrap approach after its formulation. “They did not know how exactly to use the complicated equations that arise from the Bootstrap approach,” he says. But the scenario has changed with the advent of better computers and improved computational algorithms. “Since 2008, new numerical methods have led to new insights into using the Bootstrap equations,” says Aninda. “From 2015, my collaborators and I have been trying to make sense of the correct way to take the Bootstrap approach,” he adds. When they investigated the technical difficulties of this approach, they found that it did not consider an important factor –– certain symmetries of nature.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Symmetries are very common in nature. When a particular object is subjected to a specific change, for example, rotation –– but remains similar to before the change, it is symmetric under that change. Mathematical equations describing physical theories also exhibit symmetries, that is, they remain unchanged when subject to mathematical operations. The mathematician Amelie Emmy Noether discovered that a particular physical quantity remains conserved whenever there are symmetries in physical laws. For example, the conservation of mass-energy is related to symmetries of the mathematical equations describing nature with respect to time. The Feynman diagrams also exhibit a special kind of symmetry, the ‘crossing symmetry’, which has interesting consequences. For example, physical processes involving a couple of electrons and a couple of positrons have the same probabilities even when an electron exchanges with a positron.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The crossing symmetry is an inherent property of the Feynman diagram approach of quantum field theories. However, it is a restriction that needs to be imposed mathematically on the Bootstrap method. Aninda and Ahmadullah did just that. In doing so, the calculations of the Bootstrap approach became simpler. Their equations, which relate the probabilities of different processes, started looking similar to the Feynman diagram method. They calculated some of these mathematical steps with pen on paper. For others, they used an advanced analytical software meant for automating such complicated calculations.</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: justify;">“We had to reinterpret conceptually as well as mathematically an older work from the 1970s as well as connect it up with current attempts over the last two years by other groups. It was quite a challenge!” shares Aninda.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">They credit their work to calculations documented in a 1972 study by two physicists Auberson and Khuri. When they came across this paper, they found that it was hardly ever cited by other researchers. “No one knew about this paper, which is evidence that there are hidden treasures in the past,” remarks Aninda. Two or three other groups, one involving S. M. Roy, an Indian physicist at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Physics, Mumbai, had followed up on Auberson and Khuri. However, these efforts remained largely forgotten. Delays caused in the pre-email communication also contributed to a lack of coherent communication. Today, Aninda, Ahmadullah, and their colleagues from various institutions spread across India are perennially connected online.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="" src="https://researchmatters.in/sites/default/files/feynman_diagrams-debdutta2.jpg" style="width: 100%; height:auto;" /><br /><span style="color:#a9a9a9;"><sup>The magic of complex variables enables us to see Feynman diagrams emerge “locally”. [Image Credits: Ahmadullah Zahed, an author of the study.]</sup></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The study has provided a bridge between the seemingly different approaches to quantum field theories. But, there is more to it. The Feynman diagram approach is also useful in predicting things that happen around us –– atoms do not crumble, radioactive elements decay with time, particles collide to give rise to other particles. Nobel Laureate Kenneth Wilson and his collaborators used it to study physical quantities like specific heat, the amount of heat a kilogram of water requires to be heated per unit degree Celsius rise in temperature. He had shown that it is possible to calculate how the specific heat changes with temperature, specifically at temperatures above which water cannot be liquified even after applying tremendous pressure.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In an earlier work <a href="https://researchmatters.in/article/redrawing-feynman-diagrams-scientists-develop-new-tool-solve-equations-quantum-realm" target="_blank">conducted in 2017</a>, the researchers, in collaboration with Professor Rajesh Gopakumar, director of the International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS), Bengaluru, had used the Bootstrap approach to study the dependence of specific heat on temperature. “There were a couple of mathematical gaps in the broad scheme of calculation we had proposed in 2017,” says Rajesh. By invoking the crossing symmetries, they have now fixed those gaps, and it has opened up a whole new range of questions both theoretically and experimentally. This study has also been <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.211602" target="_blank">published</a> in the journal <em>Physical Review Letters</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Changes between different phases of matter, like solids and liquids, happen primarily in two ways, explains Rajesh. How physical quantities like temperature, pressure change as the transition occurs –– determine the kind of transition. In one type, the changes are steady, while in the other, sudden. Hence, studying these physical properties becomes essential for understanding the properties of the transition. The Bootstrap approach makes mathematical predictions of these physical properties for materials in which the phase transitions are continuous. It is now up to the experimentalists to verify these predictions. Given the tremendous progress of methods in experimental physics, it might take only a few years, opines Rajesh.</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: justify;">“Our study shows how ideas inspired by a theory of particle physics and gravitation can play a role in explaining ordinary phenomena. It is a remarkable example of how one field of physics can influence another,” he signs off.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr /><p style="text-align: justify;"><em>This article has been run past the researchers, whose work is covered, to ensure accuracy</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Editor's Note: The aticle was edited to include a couple of hyperlinks. </em></p>
</div>
<div class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden field__item"><h2><a href="https://researchmatters.in/news/bridged-gaps-between-mathematical-methods-understanding-nature" hreflang="en">Bridged: Gaps between mathematical methods of understanding nature</a></h2>
</div>
<div class="field field--name-field-source field--type-link field--label-inline">
<div class="field__label">Source</div>
<div class="field__items">
<div class="field__item"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.181601">Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations in Quantum Field Theories</a></div>
<div class="field__item"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.211602">Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations for Mellin Amplitudes</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field field--name-field-tags field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix">
<h3 class="field__label inline">Tags</h3>
<ul class="links field__items"><li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/iisc" hreflang="en">IISc</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/bootstrap-approach" hreflang="en">Bootstrap approach</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/mathematics" hreflang="en">Mathematics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/feynman-diagrams" hreflang="en">Feynman Diagrams</a></li>
</ul></div>
Fri, 28 May 2021 05:10:05 +0000Research Matters2429 at https://researchmatters.inRedrawing Feynman diagrams: Scientists develop new tool to solve equations in the quantum realm
https://researchmatters.in/article/redrawing-feynman-diagrams-scientists-develop-new-tool-solve-equations-quantum-realm
<span class="a2a_kit a2a_kit_size_32 addtoany_list" data-a2a-url="https://researchmatters.in/article/redrawing-feynman-diagrams-scientists-develop-new-tool-solve-equations-quantum-realm" data-a2a-title="Redrawing Feynman diagrams: Scientists develop new tool to solve equations in the quantum realm"><a class="a2a_button_facebook"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter"></a><a class="a2a_button_email"></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Fresearchmatters.in%2Farticle%2Fredrawing-feynman-diagrams-scientists-develop-new-tool-solve-equations-quantum-realm&title=Redrawing%20Feynman%20diagrams%3A%20Scientists%20develop%20new%20tool%20to%20solve%20equations%20in%20the%20quantum%20realm"></a></span><span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-above">March 2,2017</span>
<div class="field field--name-field-op-main-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field__item"> <img rel="rnews:associatedMedia schema:associatedMedia" loading="lazy" src="https://researchmatters.in/sites/researchmatters.in/files/styles/620px_wide/public/main/articles/DSC_0868.JPG?itok=J6fk4-PB" width="620" height="413" alt="" title="Rajesh Gopakumar, Apratim Kaviraj and Aninda Sinha (L to R) with the squiggly lines next to them are the new diagrams." typeof="foaf:Image" class="image-style-_20px-wide" /></div>
Read time: 4 mins
<div class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden field__item"><a href="https://researchmatters.in/users/research-matters" rel="sioc:has_creator" hreflang="en">Research Matters</a></div>
<div property="rnews:name schema:name" class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden field__item"><h2><a href="https://researchmatters.in/article/redrawing-feynman-diagrams-scientists-develop-new-tool-solve-equations-quantum-realm" hreflang="en">Redrawing Feynman diagrams: Scientists develop new tool to solve equations in the quantum realm</a></h2>
</div>
<div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-field-op-caption field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field__item"><p>Photo Credit: Dennis C. Joy / Research Matters</p>
</div>
<div property="rnews:articlebody schema:articleBody" class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p style="text-align: justify;">In 1948, celebrated physicist and Nobel laureate, Richard Feynman introduced what came to be called Feynman diagrams. These were a pictorial representation of mathematical equations and served as a powerful tool in understanding and visualizing complex interactions between sub-atomic particles like protons and electrons. But this simplistic tool could not handle complex problems, where particles underwent many interactions, but instead produced incomprehensible and confounding answers, like infinities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now, a group of Indian theorists comprising Prof. Rajesh Gopakumar from the International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS), Prof. Aninda Sinha from Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and his students Apratim Kaviraj, and Kallol Sen from IISc and Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, The University of Tokyo, Japan, have developed an alternative version of such diagrams that avoids some of the complexities of Feynman diagrams, while providing much more ease and accuracy computationally. Their work titled ‘Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin space’ was published in the prestigious journal - Physical Review Letters, on the 21st of February, 2017.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Quantum physics, the physics that describes the sub-atomic world, is often non perceptive and unintuitive. Unlike macroscopic objects that we interact with on a daily basis, the properties of subatomic particles differ quite dramatically. For example, a sub-atomic particle can exist in multiple locations and multiple states, at the same time. This makes studying the interactions between sub-atomic particles a very difficult problem.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Feynman diagrams provide an easy way out, by allowing one to create a graphical representation of such interactions, thus simplifying calculations. However, with advances in technology like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, we are now able to measure properties of the sub atomic particles with ever increasing accuracy. Calculating the same properties to similar accuracy using Feynman diagrams is time consuming and often impossible as it becomes tricky to handle the infinities that typically pop up. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For the current study, the researchers revived an idea first proposed four decades ago. “In the 1970’s, a brilliant Soviet physicist named Alexander Polyakov first formulated the basic structure of what’s called the conformal bootstrap method, which was used to solve equations in Conformal Field Theory (CFT), by exploiting certain symmetries of systems. Back when it was proposed, it was very obscure and nobody really understood it. In one of my earlier works, we revisited this method and that got me started on this current program. In our current work, we built on this idea to develop the new method”, says Prof. Aninda Sinha, Professor at the Centre for High Energy Physics at IISc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For their new method, the team used ideas from string theory to build upon Polyakov’s ideas. The researchers implemented the conformal bootstrap method using Witten diagrams, which are simpler Feynman diagrams with one higher dimension of space- known as Anti de Sitter (AdS) space-time. They then tested the validity of the new approach by calculating various experimentally measurable quantities of liquids like water, at their critical point. The critical point, is a special temperature and pressure at which the liquid-vapour transition of water, has the simultaneous coexistence of liquid and vapour. “These points have enhanced symmetries and are described by the Conformal Field Theories. On applying our method on the CFT that governs the critical point of water, we were able to determine various physical quantities of these critical points which would be very difficult to compute using Feynman Diagrams”, remarks Prof. Rajesh Gopakumar, Director of ICTS.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although the researchers have just proposed a methodology to solve difficult problems in quantum physics, the tools used to develop the new method may be pointing at a new description of the building blocks of the universe. “What does one mean by String theory? It basically means that there are an infinite number of higher mass particles. All the possible excitations to a particle are present, with each excitation representing a higher mass particle. It is becoming clear when we look at these equations that there could be some kind of structure similar to what’s proposed by string theory. So it is possible that these equations might be pointing towards string theory, but which one? It could be one of the existing string theories or indicating at some new physics. If I were a betting person, I would say that this is pointing towards some new physics, which needs to be explored”, concludes Prof. Sinha. </p>
</div>
<div class="field field--name-field-tags field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix">
<h3 class="field__label inline">Tags</h3>
<ul class="links field__items"><li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/feynman-diagrams" hreflang="en">Feynman Diagrams</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/physics" hreflang="en">physics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/international-centre-theoretical-sciences" hreflang="en">International Centre for Theoretical Sciences</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/tags/tifr" hreflang="en">TIFR</a></li>
<li><a href="https://researchmatters.in/iisc" hreflang="en">IISc</a></li>
</ul></div>
Thu, 02 Mar 2017 03:30:00 +0000Research Matters151 at https://researchmatters.in